In the part 1, I discussed how many luxury brands are failing across Asia as they treat Asian consumers as a homogeneous group and how it led my co-authors and I to examine this phenomenon in-depth. Using the value perceptions framework and theory of impression management, we discovered some very interesting differences among consumers
You may also want to read these posts...
- Seriously, I thought Haier was a German brand! Detrimental effects of country of origin misclassification on bottomline
- “Naming and shaming obesity, not the person”: negative attitudes towards obesity leads to eating healthily but diet plans may backfire
- Synthetic diamonds are forever too, or are they!
They are not all same (Part 1): how Asian consumers differ in their luxury consumption – case of India
While luxury in Asia is booming with the rise of new money and an affluent consumption class the picture is not rosy for all the luxury brands emerging within or outside of Asia. Some stellar examples of struggle involve Prada and Mulberry in China, Aigner and de Grisogono in India and Ermenegildo Zegna entering,